Using Zod as validator might make things more complex to maintain #47
Labels
No labels
bug
dependencies
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: ABOCN/TelegramBot#47
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Originally posted by @ihatenodejs in https://github.com/abocn/TelegramBot/pull/46#discussion_r2059361824
To provide a longer explanation:
I don't want to make it harder for you to contribute to Kowalski because of this migration, especially if we use Zod.
I've seen that Zod is very helpful, and I have used it in some of my projects. However, this is another thing you have to learn, so I do not want to make too many changes
@lucmsilva651 basically, if we use Zod, code quality will be better but it's up to you if you want to use or not, so what's your opinion about? That's what we want to know
@GiovaniFZ @ihatenodejs I will merge this PR soon, so please put Zod support into it.
Note: I don't really know how to use Zod, but since any JavaScript code can be valid TypeScript code, you guys can do the job of porting my new code to TypeScript on future.