RaySollium99/picodrive
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/RaySollium99/picodrive.git synced 2025-09-05 15:27:46 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

core, slightly increase accuracy of some hw timers

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
kub 2024-03-02 10:36:49 +01:00
parent 506adbd5eb
commit 80f51a1d59
2 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
pico/memory.c
View file

@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ void ym2612_sync_timers(int z80_cycles, int mode_old, int mode_new)
* Starting a timer takes place at the next tick, so xcycles needs to be
* rounded up to that: t = next tick# = (xcycles / TICK_ZCYCLES) + 1
*/
unsigned t = ((xcycles * (((1<<20)/TIMER_A_TICK_ZCYCLES)+1))>>20) + 1;
unsigned t = ((xcycles * (((1LL<<32)/TIMER_A_TICK_ZCYCLES)+1))>>32) + 1;
Pico.t.timer_a_next_oflow = t*TIMER_A_TICK_ZCYCLES + Pico.t.timer_a_step;
}
}
@ -1115,7 +1115,7 @@ void ym2612_sync_timers(int z80_cycles, int mode_old, int mode_new)
* reset by loading timer b. The first run of timer b after loading is
* therefore shorter by up to 15 ticks.
*/
unsigned t = ((xcycles * (((1<<20)/TIMER_A_TICK_ZCYCLES)+1))>>20) + 1;
unsigned t = ((xcycles * (((1LL<<32)/TIMER_A_TICK_ZCYCLES)+1))>>32) + 1;
int step = Pico.t.timer_b_step - TIMER_A_TICK_ZCYCLES*(t&15);
Pico.t.timer_b_next_oflow = t*TIMER_A_TICK_ZCYCLES + step;
}